Influensing results in car segment

В рубриках: Automobile | Автор: admin 07.06.2011

Influensing Results in Car Segment

I had the idea for the basic air engine in 2005 i even built a bike that runs on an air engine and i was making a go kart that is a hybrid between a gas engine and a air engine i would love to send popular mechanics a picture.

I believe you misspoke when you said you would use the air car as an “incentive”. An incentive is something that you give to someone to make a purchase more affordable or attractive, car dealers give “cash back” incentives to get people to purchase a vehicle. Do you plan on giving people air cars if they use alternative energy? I would not think so, I believe you mean that you would propose incentives (maybe tax credits)to entice people to purchase the air car. You can forget about the air car though, none of their performance claims has ever been realized. Now the air car promoters have a new design, very tiny, not roadworthy at all, I think they finally realized that they would never be able to produce a car that could carry four people any reasonable distance, so they will now try a smaller vehicle. I believe they found that you can claim what you want, but producing it is another matter because the laws of thermodynamics apply to everyone. People love to believe what sounds good to them, but you can not get something for nothing, you need energy to move objects. The air car does not have enough energy to be an alternative to internal combustion engines. The statements used by the promoters is an insult to the intelligence of anyone who has an understanding of energy, the ones who do not understand energy need to ask themselves one question,”why do these promoters always claim to need more cash? If the idea was practical, money would not be hard to come by, plain and simple.

Are you saying that incentives should be used to buy the air car? If you want to win any debate it would be wise to understand what you are speaking about. Why don’t you ask a science teacher to show you the amount of energy contained in the volume of the tank that the air car claims in their press releases. You will find that the energy in that given volume is not sufficient to move the car the claimed distances. To offer incentives to buy alternative energy vehicles, you first need to have a viable product. The air car is not by any means going to be a substitute for the internal combustion engine. Again I will say, know about the subject, when you have a thorough understanding of the air car and its claims, you will see it is not a vehicle that is in the category of “reasonable” alternative energy. Sure you can go a few miles in an air car, that is all, that is the reason they have never made it to production. For something to be an alternative it should be a reasonable substitute for what it is replacing. A bicycle is an alternative to driving, but will a bicycle replace a car, yes but only for short distances. The air car will not ever be an reasonable alternative to any current technology. It would be much better to use electricity to charge batteries to run an electric motor than to run a compressor to compress air and fill a tank to those high pressures. Ask a teacher, physics preferably, they will set you straight.

  • Добавить ВКонтакте заметку об этой странице
  • Мой Мир
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LiveJournal
  • MySpace
  • FriendFeed
  • В закладки Google
  • Google Buzz
  • Яндекс.Закладки
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • БобрДобр
  • MisterWong.RU
  • МоёМесто.ru
  • Сто закладок

Комментариев нет

Комментариев пока нет.

RSS-лента комментариев к этой записи. Адрес для трекбека

К сожалению, комментирование пока закрыто.